February 11, 2003
Performance of my XMLSig Library
My comments on this is that this is absolutely usable in large scale applications. In the NeuClear Model every transaction is verified by the transaction processing server. The server it self, in many instances doesnt have to actually sign anything. Signing takes place on client machine's, where the 270ms wont be a big deal.
The Benchmark Code itself can be found here.
Posted by pelleb at February 11, 2003 09:49 AM
Just to get some sizing idea's for NeuClear based financial applications. I decided to play with some quick benchmarks for my XMLSig library for dom4j.
I ran the tests very unscientifically within the IDE (IntelliJ IDEA of course) on my 700MHz linux P3 notebook with 512M of ram. My email and everything else was running in the back ground.
The tests them selves consisted of 1000 iterations of xml parsing and signing.
Followed by 1000 iterations of xml parsing and verification.
I got the following results per iteration:
| Signing phase | 270ms |
| Verifying phase | 18ms |
My comments on this is that this is absolutely usable in large scale applications. In the NeuClear Model every transaction is verified by the transaction processing server. The server it self, in many instances doesnt have to actually sign anything. Signing takes place on client machine's, where the 270ms wont be a big deal.
The Benchmark Code itself can be found here.
This entry was posted in the following Categories: Crypto & Security
Comments
Post a comment